Future Scan analyzes 187,837 arXiv® papers to identify research themes, gaps, and emerging trends. I use it to support my writing and consulting work.
As a writer and consultant covering AI, I needed a way to spot patterns across thousands of papers. Future Scan analyzes 187,837 arXiv® papers to identify research themes, gaps, and emerging trends.
Currently tracking 187,837 papers | Papers updated every Sunday
I designed different analysis types for different questions
Shows what research themes exist and how papers cluster around similar concepts.
When I need: A starting point for exploring a new area
Identifies which areas are well-covered versus understudied, revealing research gaps and opportunities.
When I need: To find what's missing or unexplored
Focuses on cutting-edge developments and recent advances at the research frontier.
When I need: To stay current with fast-moving areas
I added this feature for systematic reviews that need comparable data across papers
You define custom fields (methodology, sample size, key findings, whatever you need). The AI reads each paper and extracts the information, with confidence scores and supporting quotes so you can verify its work.
Everything exports to CSV for analysis in Excel, R, or your statistical software of choice.
Systematic reviews
Extract standardized information for comparison across studies
Meta-analyses
Collect quantitative results and study characteristics
Literature surveys
Track methodologies or technical approaches across papers
I looked at existing tools first, but they didn't solve the specific problem I had.
Semantic Scholar, Research Rabbit, Connected Papers: Discovering papers through citation networks and semantic search when you already know where to start.
Elicit, Consensus: Extracting data and answering specific research questions across papers.
Litmaps: Visualizing citation relationships to show how papers connect.
These tools are good at finding specific papers or answering targeted questions. But I needed to see the overall structure of a research area: how papers cluster into natural themes, which areas are crowded versus sparse, and what's emerging versus declining.
So I built this to automatically group papers by semantic similarity (using cosine similarity on embeddings), then analyze each cluster for patterns, gaps, and trends. The goal was to see the forest, not just the trees.
Watch a 5-minute video of Future Scan in action
These tools help me find papers, organize them into collections, and share results.
Finds relevant papers in ~1 minute with AI-powered semantic search. Provides instant AI summaries and relevance scores without running a full analysis. Includes filtering by author, sorting by relevance or date, and bulk selection.
View sample results →Uses semantic similarity to discover papers related to a specific source paper. Each result includes a similarity score and AI-generated summary explaining the relationship. Results can be shared publicly with a link.
Organize papers into custom collections (up to 100 papers each). Add personal notes, generate AI summaries of the entire collection, and export to PDF. Use bulk selection to add or remove multiple papers at once. Share collections publicly or keep them private.
Bulk Selection
Select multiple papers for batch operations
Advanced Filtering
Filter by author, sort by date or relevance
PDF Export
Download professional reports with summaries
Public Sharing
Share searches and collections with a link
Future Scan analyzes recent AI/ML research from arXiv, the leading open-access repository for scientific papers.
Three steps to get results
Examples: "Security risks of agentic AI" or "Healthcare applications of LLMs"
Deep Analysis: Research gaps and emerging trends
Data Extraction: Structured data for systematic reviews
Semantic Search: Quick paper discovery with AI summaries
Deep analysis gives you a thematic report. Data extraction gives you structured tables. Search gives you ranked papers with AI summaries.
Features I'm planning to add
Show how research themes evolve — identify what's emerging vs. declining
Automatically monitor research trends and send weekly summaries
Identify how ideas and techniques move between different AI/ML subfields
I'm a writer and content strategist who learned systems design, machine learning, and data engineering by building my own tools. I built Future Scan because I needed a way to track AI/ML research trends for my writing.
Karen Spinner, Founder
Learn more about the projectHow the features work and what to expect
Three types of analysis, each answering different questions:
Trend analysis uses paper abstracts from arXiv to discover research themes. The process:
The results include an interactive map showing research themes and how they relate to each other.
The analysis is based on real papers. Every cited paper is linked to arXiv for verification. Papers are grouped mathematically (not randomly), and AI analyzes abstracts from the 20 papers most central to each cluster. Summaries are based only on the abstracts. Learn more about the methodology →
Data extraction defines custom fields and extracts specific information from paper abstracts. Instead of discovering themes, it collects structured data like methodologies, datasets, performance metrics, or other information.
Useful for systematic reviews and meta-analyses that require comparable data across papers. Results include confidence scores and supporting quotes, and export to CSV for analysis.
A simple five-step process:
Each extracted field includes a confidence score (high, medium, low) and a supporting quote from the paper for verification.
Data extraction analyzes the full PDF content of each paper, not just abstracts. Not all papers contain all requested information—if a field isn't found, the AI indicates it's not found. Learn more about limitations →
Unlike keyword search, semantic search understands the meaning of the query, not just exact word matches. The process:
This allows searching for concepts, not just keywords. A query like "hallucination in language models" produces relevant results even if papers use different terminology.
Future Scan indexes papers from arXiv, an open repository of scientific papers. The database currently contains papers from October 2024 to August 2026 in these categories:
All analyses (trend analysis, data extraction, semantic search) use paper abstracts—the summaries written by authors that capture key ideas, methods, and findings.
Collections organize papers into custom groups (up to 100 papers per collection):
Using semantic similarity (the same mathematical technique used for clustering), Future Scan finds papers with similar concepts and methods to a source paper. Each result shows a similarity score (0-100%) and an AI-generated summary explaining the relationship. Results can be filtered by author, sorted by similarity or date, and saved to collections.
AI summaries appear in different contexts:
All summaries are generated by Claude (Anthropic's AI) based solely on paper abstracts. Summaries provide quick understanding without reading full papers.
Yes. Results and collections can be shared publicly:
Sharing can be toggled off anytime to make collections private again. Shared items don't require sign-in to view.